

In 1991:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION IS RISING FASTER
There are a number of advantages to government employment. Below 17 are listed. All advantages do
not exist in all government employment.
1. More generous paid fringe benefits.
2. More Paid Vacation Days and Holidays:
3. Federal Income Tax Free Value of Excess Paid Benefits:
4. Larger annual compensation increases:
5. Greater job security: Government employees have superior job security.
6. Lower productivity:
7. More paid personal days off:
8. More sick time and other paid time off:
9. Work weeks with fewer hours:
10. State Income Tax Free Value of Excess Paid Benefits:
11. Generous severance pay.
12. Earlier retirement.
13. Unused sick leave credit at retirement:
14. Expensive defined benefit retirement programs.
15. Routine pension benefits increases.
16. Paid Retiree Health Care:
17. Exemption from State Income Taxes:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ARE PAID ABOVE MARKET RATES
An excess value of government employment has been calculated using five more readily quantifiable
advantages of the 17
government employee advantages: ([1] more generous fringe benefits, [2] more paid vacation
days and holidays, [3] federal income tax free value of excess paid benefits, [4] higher compensation
increases and [5] greater job security). The excess value of government employment is the amount by which
compensation for government employees exceeds that of comparable private employees.
Over a 40 year career:
GOVERNMENT LABOR PRODUCTIVITY IS BELOW MARKET
It has been estimated that there are too many government employees. Further, private companies working
for government routinely provide public services with fewer employees than government agencies. If all states achieved the labor productivity of the
most efficient state, and the proposed reduction in federal employment were fully implemented, then substantial
savings would occur. This productivity deficit increases the excess value of government employment to approximately 70 percent.
EXCESSIVE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION IS COSTLY
THE SOLUTION IS COMPETITION
The problem is lack of competition: The incentives of the competitive market, which operate in the private
employment market, are largely absent in government. The result is higher than market costs, which
unnecessasrily increases government spending and taxation.
Two strategies can solve the problem:
2. Regulation of remaining government employee compensation and staff sizes. Regulation should
be applied to employment in government policy functions. Regulation should also be applied in functions
not yet converted to competitive incentivesCompensation
should be managed by managing employee turnover, while staff sizes should be limited to the levels
achieved for the most efficient governments.
SOURCES:
Wendell Cox and Samuel A. Brunelli, "America's Protected Class: The Excess Value of Public
Employment," The State Factor, American Legislative Exchange Council (Washington, DC: June
1994)
Wendell Cox and Samuel A. Brunelli, "America's Protected Class III: The Unfair Pay Advantage of
Publc Employees" The State Factor, American Legislative Exchange Council (Washington, DC: April
1994)
FEDERAL EMPLOYEE PAY IS ABOVE MARKET: US
Congressional Testimony
From 1980 to 1991:
THE ADVANTAGES OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT
(Uses the federal pay premium in Brent R. Moulton, A Re-examination of
the Federal-Private Wage Differential in the United States, " Journal of Labor Economics, 1990:
Vol. 8 No. 2).
The federal estimates do not include the yet to be incurred cost of the $0.9 trillion federal civilian
unfunded pension liability, which would require annual payments
of 31 percent relative to federal wages and salaries to retire over 40 years far exceeds any
conceivable private advantage with respect to the non-quantified factors. (Private pension under
funding per employee is less than 0.5 percent of federal pension under-funding per employee.
It is estimated that in 1991 the excess cost of government employment in the United States was more than
$240 billion --- more than the federal deficit. This is more than $2,500 per household.
1. Minimization of government employment, so that government employment would be limited to
inherently government functions (policy functions). Non-inherent functions would be produced by competitive
arrangements by the private sector.

WENDELL COX CONSULTANCY & THE PUBLIC PURPOSE
Contact Us by E-Mail
The Public Purpose |
Demographic Briefs |
Government Cost Review |
Intercity Transport Fact Book
Labor Market Reporter |
Realities |
School Transport Fact Book |
Transport Fact Book
Urban Transport Fact Book |
Competitive Tendering Website
International Competition & Ownership Conference |
Publications |
New Items |
To Subscribe (Free)